Evidence registry for archery

The claims that circulate in archery teaching, each with its evidence status, its sources and its history.

Where to start · How the registry works · What people say and the studies do not confirm · The state of research

721 claims · 74% with evidence on archers

Category
Status
Discipline
Level

All 130 claims on technique and biomechanics

All 100 claims on physical training

All 183 claims on mind and attention

All 147 claims on equipment and tuning

All 78 claims on competition and scoring

All 83 claims on health and recovery

How to read the statuses

A status is a dated editorial judgement, not an automatic calculation. The label says how well a claim holds up with the literature available in a given year. The share "with evidence on archers" counts the claims that have at least one study on archers for or against them: studies cited only as context do not count.

  • CorroboratedSeveral studies on archers, with adequate designs, point the same way.
  • ReportedThere is supporting evidence on archers, but it is limited: one study, few participants or only an association.
  • ContestedStudies on archers point in opposite directions.
  • TransferredNo direct evidence on archers: the claim rests on studies of other sports or the general population.
  • ContradictedWhat evidence there is goes against the claim, but it is thin or indirect: a single study on archers, few participants, or only studies from other sports.
  • RefutedSeveral studies on archers, with adequate designs, show the opposite or no effect.
  • Not studiedNo relevant evidence.
  • PredictedThe Lab has registered a testable prediction and is waiting for the outcome.