After a correction the old technique tends to come back
1 study · 3 archers measured
The summary today
The only source in the registry is the account of three veteran Korean national team coaches, each interviewed three times for at least ninety minutes. One of them estimates that when you fix something that looks ugly, in the end 80 to 90 per cent of the movement goes back to how it was, because the skills built in youth stay; he adds that a posture polished in training can still collapse in competition, and that fixing one flaw can create another. Hence their choice to build on the archer's strengths rather than straighten out what does not please the eye. It is experience gathered with a method from coaches who led the national team for years, two of them for more than thirty-five, but the percentage is an estimate from memory, not a measurement: no study has followed archers after a correction to see how well it holds.
Also phrased as: "old technique coming back"; "falling back into old habits"; "corrections do not stick"; "old form returning under pressure"; "changing technique"
In practice
It is said that a technical correction holds as long as the archer is thinking about it, and that under pressure or after a few weeks the body goes back to its usual movement.
Evidence
-
2025
Context Archers Published later
Three veteran Korean national team coaches, men aged 63 to 65, each interviewed three times for at least ninety minutes and read through an inductive analysis: one of them says that if you fix something that looks bad, something happens straight away, but in the end 80 to 90 per cent goes back to its original state, because the skills developed in youth remain. It is one coach's estimate from memory, not a measurement.
Understanding the purposeful journey of an Korean archery coach group's self-directed professional development: a qualitative exploration of coaching expertise enhancement · Heonjae Lee, Ooksang Cho
-
2025
Context Archers Published later
In the same study, the context of that estimate: the coaches say they build on strengths rather than correcting what does not please the eye, they cite the country's first men's individual Olympic champion, whose technique was left alone, and one of them notes that even a posture polished in training can collapse in competition in one or two youngsters. Fixing one flaw, they say, can create another.
Understanding the purposeful journey of an Korean archery coach group's self-directed professional development: a qualitative exploration of coaching expertise enhancement · Heonjae Lee, Ooksang Cho
Status history
- 2025 Not studied The question enters the literature through the coaches. Three veteran Korean national team coaches, interviewed at length about how they work, say they prefer building on an archer's strengths to correcting faults, and one of them gives a figure: after a correction, in the end, 80 to 90 per cent of the movement goes back to where it started. It is one coach's estimate from memory, gathered with a qualitative method, and nobody has followed archers after a correction to see how well it holds: the question has not yet been studied.
Related
Related articles
- Common beginner mistakes in archery and how to avoid themThe most common beginner mistakes in archery, from posture and release to equipment, and what the measurements made on beginners actually show.
- Is there one correct technique, or only yours?Elite archers do not all shoot the same way: what the studies have measured, what every archer shares and what remains a personal signature.
- Motor learning in archery: how a movement becomes automaticThe three stages of motor learning and what studies on archers show: the brain, movement variability, corrections, goals, video and distance.
Research lines
Where there are no studies on archers, every decision starts from a written hypothesis and is checked against the data over time.
See the full assessmentCite
Campagna, M. (2026). After a correction the old technique tends to come back (Version 2). In Evidence Registry. Retrieved 16 October 2026, from https://matteocampagna.com/en/registry/technique/corrected-technique-comes-back
@misc{campagna2026_correggeretecnicatornaindietro,
author = {Campagna, Matteo},
title = {After a correction the old technique tends to come back},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Evidence Registry, matteocampagna.com},
url = {https://matteocampagna.com/en/registry/technique/corrected-technique-comes-back},
note = {Version 2; accessed 2026-10-16}
}
Follow this claim
RSS is an address you paste into a feed reader: each time this claim changes status, adds a year to its history or is revised, a new item appears there.
Registry updates by email
At most one email a month, sent only when something has changed: claims that change status, new claims, Lab predictions registered or resolved, new studies and new books.
Sign-ups are handled by Systeme.io, the service that runs the newsletter. Every email has a link to unsubscribe with one click.
Other claims in this domain
- CorroboratedBetween one and a half and two tenths of a second pass between the clicker sounding and the arrow leaving7 studies · 94 archers measuredStatus since 1990
- ReportedA camera diagonally behind the archer measures the vertical sway of the aim well, but not the horizontal1 study · 3 archers measuredStatus since 2010
- ReportedA continuous final pull through the clicker leads to better shots9 studies · 56 archers measuredStatus since 1993
- ReportedA sound or light cue about the angle of the bow arm tightens beginners' groups2 studies · 1 archers measuredStatus since 2012
- ReportedA thumb grip on the string is less tiring than a finger grip3 studies · 9 archers measuredStatus since 1990